I use the ‘configuration matrix’ option to build a matrix of browsers to run the tests, this way I can have one job that represents a test run on multiple boxes and multiple browsers on each box. Drilling down allows me to see the results for each of these test runs within the job. (Configuration Matrix is awesome btw, except for one really annoying bug for, which there is a reasonable workaround)

Having many build resources, sometimes I want to move a job from one machine to another in order to equalize load on the different machines or to have a job running in ff2 and ie6 instead of ff3 and ie7. Thus the need for a uniform build step that will run the same way regardless of the machine or installed browsers, became necessary. Additionally the commands for running tests got bigger and less manageable all the time, so the time for a clean user interface finally came. This way I can automatically append arguments like ‘exit’ to keep the build step interface simple and clean.

The other simplification is that in the Hudson configuration page for the Windmill Test plug-in you can tell it to automatically call the contrib ‘clean_run.py’ script with the correct arguments (assuming clean_run.py can be found in your path).

As I am relatively new to the Java world, I struggled through the development process but thanks to some reasonable plug-in documentation, responses from the hudson dev mailing list and some IRC conversations with Kohsuke (thanks so much) I finally have something that sufficiently addresses my needs.

Screenshots

Project

The code is all available on GitHub and I welcome any improvements or input from the community as I know that continuous integration is a very important piece of the utility provided by Windmill and this pieces should be as easy as possible to setup.

The combination of this plug-in, and others like the amazon s3 plug-in or the hudson VMware plugin bring us that much closer to seamlessly creating test resources, running our functional web tests across all of our supported platforms and then throwing it away until it’s again needed (or using the CLOUD).I have also done some integration with virtual box that I have found to be very successful.

Download

• Hudson Windmill Plugin 0.4

Please log bugs and let me know what you think! If you are an avid Java and or Hudson plug-in developer and you are interested in contributing, please jump right in!

First off, I have to say that for those of you who don’t know, PyCon is a community organized event, and amazingly well done. I was impressed by the design of the conference, the way they had four talks going on at once and they tried to keep them in a similar interest track. Every talk I attended was at least “good”, and many were “great”. You could really feel a community vibe, and for a conference that had 800+ attendees in the middle of a major recession they had every right to be excited.

There were two major themes content wise that really impressed me, the first was an amazing amount of web framework focus. Django obviously being the twinkle in the eye of the community, but there were smaller communities for each of the other projects, Pylons-Turbo Gears, web2py and lots of tools built on top of them. One that struck me with some major promise is the Pinax Project. Their goal is to make it so that I don’t ever have to deal with building user registration and in site messaging… and all the other features expected for any site that has social network functionality.

The other major theme was a mini testing conference going on within PyCon, that I was very comfortable hanging around with. We had a hugely successful Birds Of a Feather, as well as a surprisingly active Open Space talk for Windmill.

The “Using Windmill” talk turns out to be pretty successful in every aspect that I really care about. I do wish that I had been able to get a little more sleep the night before, and I have to admit the size of the venue was a bit overwhelming. I now realize watching the footage that I used the word “UM” way too much, and the demo videos must have been hard to watch from the very back of the room. But barring those two things, I am quite happy (I shall learn and practice for the next round of shameless PR at OSCON 2009).

The “Functional Testing Tools in Python” panel was very successful, and a lot of fun. I always enjoy the friendly banter between the different project owners. Everyone has a different opinion on what they care about, focus on and feel they do the best. Obviously since the only two projects represented that focused on Web Testing were Windmill and Selenium, we got a lot of attention.

Watching that panel footage I definitely think that the introductions were too long, but I still think our Journey themed – mind blowing – Windmill demo video was a great intro. At the very least, the audience had a little entertainment before the geek droning began

Slide had an awesome presence this year, a fun booth, huge banners everywhere and 6 attendees. It was fun to see all of the great responses I received about Slide from people out there in Python land.

Here are links to the videos:

• Using Windmill: http://pycon.blip.tv/file/1947236/
• Functional Testing Tools in Python Panel: http://pycon.blip.tv/file/1947342/

And some pictures:

If you are interested in seeing the new and improved version of the “Using Windmill” talk, please make it out to OSCON 2009, “Scheduled for 16:30 on 22 Jul 2009.” in San Jose, CA.

We are waiting to hear back from both Open Source Bridge and the AJAX Experience as to whether we will be participating in those conferences (fingers crossed)!

The combination of writing content style HTML, and the good advice we received have come together into what I feel is a pretty usable user interface. Granted this is the first revision and will probably continually be refined to become even more user friendly, but from 1.0 to 1.1 it is a vast improvement.

Improved Editor

The first major improvement is the implementation of a full featured code editor named EditArea.

We have been keeping our eye on Bespin, which we will look more into integrating when it is a bit more modular.

For the meantime EditArea does a great job, and was *relatively* painless to integrate.

Some of the features include:

• Multiple file editing
• Syntax hilighting
• Full Screen mode
• Adjustable font properties
• Jump to line numbers
• Search and replace
• Automatic tabulation
• Toggle hi-lighting
• Toggle edit modes

EditArea implements execCommand similar to the implementation in Midas.

Reorganized Menu’s

Part of the move from XUL involved no longer relying on the toolbox, so we have reorganized the menu’s into dialog’s (don’t worry most functions have a keyboard shortcut if you are one of those people that doesn’t want to deal with that extra click).

This cleanly displays all the available options, and doesn’t clutter up the main UI. This also provides space to easily add new features that fall into these logical spaces in the future.

Improved Inspector

There was a lot of frustration when it came to getting the results from the inspector into the editor, some of this had to do with the non editable default nature of the elements we were using to draw them out in XUL, but the integration of the feature into the IDE became very messy and confusing.

This creates an obvious separation between the rest of the UI and the inspector feature and puts helper features out in front of you to simplify the process by dumping to the clipboard and then moving you to a focused editor window.

Improved Output

The output UI has been completely revamped to give you the most important information quickly, but allow you to navigate down an expandable tree to explore the output of the exception.

All of the information in the output divs can be easily selected and copied to stick in bugs etc, but also saves you a trip to the error console as it should encompass all of the information being thrown in the error object, serialized and organized into a more readable format.

Thanks to JQuery UI’s information and error boxes I was able to tweak the CSS to make some relatively attractive, but more importantly, informative UI that should quickly give you the status of your test run.

More Information

• MozMill Google Code Project
• Mikeal Rogers Release Blog Post
• Google Code XPI Download
• QMO Documentation
• MozMill on PyPi

Thanks everyone who logged bugs!

The first step is to get a couple machines that you want use as slaves and a machine to run Hudson, our setup looks like this:

Each of the machines with a different OS has Windmill installed. To make them slaves you simply bring up the Hudson web page on the machine, and run the launcher.. now it’s a slave — crazy easy right?

Now to setup test runs for the machines, in Hudson you click: “New Job” on the left hand side and do something like the following:

Tie this job to the slave you want it to run on (we can’t have IE runs happening on MacOSX):

Tell this job to run 10 and 30 minutes after the hour:

The build steps to actually run the tests, the first kills any straggling processes (more details below):

On the Mac for the Safari job, I want to make sure there aren’t any instances of Safari left hanging, or windmill processes sitting around so we do:
ps -ax | grep windmill | awk '{ print $1 }' | xargs kill | true
ps -ax | grep Safari | awk '{ print $1 }' | xargs kill | true


Then we want to grab the latest test code from svn and launch the windmill test:
svn up /Users/adam/Documents/main_bt/windmill/
python /usr/local/bin/windmill safari http://www.facebook.com test=/Users/adam/Documents/main_bt/windmill/fb email=username@slide.com password=pass report=true exit
rm /Users/adam/Library/Cookies/Cookies.plist


I am telling windmill to run a test against facebook.com, with the test hierarchy in the windmill/fb directory in Safari, with the provided email and password, then to report it’s results and exit.

The only thing different on our windows test runs is the way we kill the processes:
Example:
taskkill /F /T /IM windmill.exe
taskkill /F /T /IM firefox.exe


You might be asking how do I use those variables, check it out in my setup module:

1
2
3
4
5
6

def setup_module(module):
    client = WindmillTestClient(__name__)
    client.type(text=functest.registry['email'], id=u'email')
    client.type(text=functest.registry['password'], id=u'pass')
    client.click(id=u'doquicklogin')
    client.waits.forPageLoad(timeout=u'100000')

You can also read a great entry about adding reporting to your tests on Mikeal Rogers blog, here.

And that last line removing Cookies.plist makes sure that the next test run starts without any cookies set to cause problems.

Have Hudson keep you updated on Jabber:

Grab the generated XML output so you can view the test results in Hudson:

Do this for each of the test runs you would like to have, and boom — continuous integration:

This is obviously a simple scenario, and you can do way, way more customization.. but this should get you off the ground. Happy testing!

Project Status

I have spent nearly every day since July 7th working to bring the Windmill Project up to a level where it can be used reliably in a production environment. Our mission starts with “Windmill is a web testing framework intended for complete automation of user interface testing”, of course this refers to the web including everything and anything inside the browser window. This turns out to be a very large task, one that only an Open Source labor of love could possibly attempt to accomplish.

Windmill has slowly evolved as a project with user contributions, a moderately active IRC channel, and enough users to keep me from forgetting what a useful and powerful tool it is. When I was offered the opportunity to work on the project I quickly saw how much needed to be done in order to get to where we needed to be. We still aren’t quite there, and like most Open Source projects we might not ever get to the envisioned perfection, however recently we hit a very important milestone. The project is now fully hosted and run by the committers, and in many ways “Grown Up”, thanks to a lot of good advise and hard work. The milestone we have reached, is that Windmill is ready for YOU to use. This week we pushed 0.8.2, which is a release that has addressed all of the major issues that we know about and have discovered with heavy usage over the past months. Our hopes are that you will go install Windmill 0.8.2 and things will just WORK. If not, I can’t wait to get your issues in trac and see what we can do to fix them.

Priorities

The main things we care about when it comes to our web testing tools:

• Low barrier to entry, low learning curve, and ease of use
• Thorough documentation, community and project support
• Support for the big 3 platforms; Windows, MacOSX and Linux
• Support for the big 4 browsers; Firefox, IE, Safari and Opera
• Easy integration with continuous integration tools
• Reliability; developers aren’t going to pay attention if the failures aren’t real
• A really nice looking logo, and a web site that is easy on the eyes..

There are always more features to implement, but Windmill hasn’t needed new features for a very long time. What Windmill needed was some serious QA, some code cleanup and a whole mess of bug fixes. If you look through the Trac Timeline you will see the massive amounts of all of the above that have happened and I am proud as hell when I launch the application today and see all that it can do.

What can Windmill do?

Windmill offers the ability to build, write, record and run tests as well as aid in debugging and development. In addition, the framework provides the ability to create and maintain hierarchies of smart and thorough tests that will ensure the quality of your web applications over time. Not only can we save you hours creating and maintaing tests, but we can also help you see your web application as a growing feature rich product, instead of a QA nightmare.

Many tools out there provide ways to write tests, some even provide recorders and DOM explorers, but none that I have ever seen provide this rich functionality cross platform and cross browser, which is really what is required in order to build a thorough test repository that represents all your possible users.

The current set of major features can be found at the Windmill Features Page as well as more details about what is currently available. One of the more exciting new features is the full integration with Firebug Lite. Web developers rely on the existence of Firebug in order to quickly build and debug web applications, and Firebug Lite is the next best thing. It’s hard to even describe how useful it has been to instantly access the JavaScript Console and DOM inspector in IE to debug a failing test. As the Open Source community grows, and tools are improved and brought to light, I think it’s very important to do everything we can to utilize these tools and use them to enhance the Windmill Framework.

Keeping it Open

The Open Source aspect of Windmill has turned out to be it’s greatest asset. The project is almost entirely written in JavaScript and Python, which instantly gives us many advantages over the competition. The JavaScript community is constantly evolving and is most certainly the futures technology platform. Python has a very strong community as well and has given us immense amounts of functionality and flexibility right out of the box.

One of the most exciting things to me personally about this particular project is the immense potential user base out there, and the large impact the Windmill Tools can have on the daily work flow of it’s users. Windmill was obviously inspired with the hopes of minimizing the need for manual testing of rich web applications, and has grown to be much more than that.

The future of the work to be done on Windmill will primarily be driven by the needs of it’s users, the changes and development of the industry and the success of it reaching the goal, to make web automation better.

Moving Forward

Concluding this major push of work, testing, documentation and moving of infrastructure; we now need to see how the community feels. There are lots of choices out there for web automation and we have made many differentiating choices along the way. It is now time to get the word out and take in some real feedback.

Thanks you all for input, contributions, patience and valuable feedback. Those of you who spent many hours on Freenode in #windmill with us debugging and hunting down those spastic blockers are troopers and we really appreciate it.

As some of you may have heard, today I resigned from my position at Rearden Commerce. Leaving a company is never a fun thing, because you know how you feel when you hear that someone else is leaving.. and you can see it in people’s eyes. I have reminded myself multiple times today that I am still going to be 30 mins away, most of my communication with those people has been via email and IM and there is no reason for me not to stay in touch.

Why did I resign?

That’s a very good question. Let me preface this by saying that I really don’t have anything about Rearden that I can point at and say ‘this thing’ is why I left. Rearden is a great company, they were professional through out my entire experience there. They employ many very talented and driven engineers, and they have a great product. My gut feeling after spending some time there, is that they will do very well. The management team is very skilled and they know their market and niche extremely well. Every day I went to work I heard about a new major deal or a small company Rearden had acquired to contribute to their march toward owning the ‘Personal Assistant’ space.

When I first arrived there I struggled with two things, and ultimately wound up being my demise as an employee. I have an extreme passion for Open Source, being part of that community, and giving my time to contribute. So you are probably thinking, ‘Why didn’t I just do that on the side?’ — well the answer is that I did do it on the side and the results were slow and my sleep schedule paid the price. Rearden has a very business/enterprise specific niche at the moment, and building and deploying new features to those customers is a priority (as it should be), but I couldn’t stop my Open Source envy. 

Secondly, a overwhelming majority of their user base is using IE6. As a web developer — the last thing I do when building anything in client side JavaScript is to test it in IE6. I basically hold my nose, load the page and pray that things ‘mostly work’. Now I’m not going to claim that I can ever get away from doing this, but building really cutting edge features based on new technology becomes significantly less probable when you are catering to this crowd. I know that Rearden has some really cool future plans, and is publicly talking about bringing the application to the consumer market — but I’m impatient and I just simply didn’t want to wait.

What’s Next?

I am going to jump right into a gig with Slide Inc. as a Web Developer. However, before I get to any Web Development tasks I am going to be addressing a pretty serious need they have in their QA department. Slide currently has many applications that are used directly on their site, slide.com and on social networks (primarily facebook.com and myspace.com) and right now they have essentially no functional automation.

At OSAF I saw what a major difference automated testing can make, and the reason I am so excited about this is because I was a QA Engineer at one point manually testing a pretty complex web application (Cosmo) and I have seen how much a difference test automation can make in the release cycle, the development cycle, QA test cycles and simply the daily lives of your poor QA teams.

How am I going to accomplish this task you might ask? Thats the best part — I have fixed about 10 bugs in Windmill in the last week, and will be putting whatever effort is required into getting Windmill to a state where we can functionally automate all of Slides application testing. This looks to be a serious win for Slide, and a serious win for Windmill. 

At some point in the future, when I feel that this project is to the point where it can be maintained and built on by the Slide QA teams I will move on to Web Development tasks. At that point a smaller amount of time will still be allocated to maintaining Windmill, adding new features that Slide and the community need and working towards the next evolution of Windmill. That is quite a ways off in the future, so I will address all that when the time comes.

The rest of my ‘free’ development time, will be consumed by a project that I am involved in with the Mozilla Corporation. This project lives in the QA realm as well, and could probably be classified as a distant cousin to Windmill. More details about that will be announced the week of OSCON, so keep your eyes pealed.

Change can be extremely tough, but it is also very exciting. I want to thank all of my former peers at Rearden for a good experience, and I wish them all the absolute best.